I have observed a number of organizational leaders over the years who were guilty of reacting,
and making decisions, in response to “the last person heard.”
It
is a painful situation to feel like
you know what you’re supposed to be doing,
you understand the direction of the organization,
you have a good feel for “how
things need to be done,”
you're making organizational progress at a brisk clip,
only to have a curve ball thrown at you as a result of
someone getting in the ear of a boss who succumbs to “the last person
heard.”
And,
every organization I’ve worked in had a few of those folks who refrained from
making their positions known, from engaging in the dialogue/debate, but who
always seemed to seek the boss out in private to try to influence (or reverse) decisions. A very common ploy of said characters is that
they portend to be speaking on behalf of a whole group of others.
Leaders
should always listen. But, leaders should
be very cautious of folks who operate in such clandestine fashion.
Arguments/positions, if worthy, should be able to stand the rigor of open discourse. If they can't, the boss shouldn't be giving them credence (even if they do come from "the last person heard").
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.